Closing the Global Gender Gap

Gendergap_cover07_o

Sweden (1), Norway (2), Finland (3) and Iceland (4) once again top the rankings in the latest Global Gender Gap Report. All countries in the top 20 made progress relative to their scores last year – some more so than others. Latvia (13) and Lithuania (14) made the biggest advances among the top 20, gaining six and seven places respectively, driven by smaller gender gaps in labour force participation and wages. The Report covers a total of 128 countries, representing over 90% of the world’s population.

Click on the links in the right hand column to learn more about the Report
; the rankings (PDF I Excel); country profiles; photos and the press release.

Denmark tops World Economic Forum Global Information Technology Report 2006-2007 rankings for the first time

Gitr_2007_cover_hp2 Denmark tops the rankings of The Global Information Technology Report 2006-2007 's "Networked Readiness Index", as a culmination of an upward trend since 2003. Sweden, Singapore and Finland follow, while the United States loses ground in networked readiness, falling 6 places to 7th position. With record coverage of 122 economies, the GITR has become the world’s most respected assessment of the impact of ICT on the development process and the competitiveness of nations.

Watch video interviews with the Report authors and read more here!

How does your country perform in the rankings? How important is ICT to your life?

challenging paradigms

Related to the previous blog posted on the late 19th Century migration, it appears that

Australia

is one of the few countries that more or less maintain a model of migration consistent with those days. They allow a controlled amount of unskilled-labor immigration, and contrary to what could be expected by European policy setters, unemployment of the local population is lowered. I actually thing the

US

accomplishes a similar feat via significant illegal unskilled labor immigration.

Paradigm to question: Countries should first find jobs for their locals before allowing immigration.

Another key problem seems to be that people skills do not match job skills. On the job training has to start playing a bigger role. On the job training and investment in people has played a much bigger role a few decades back, but it seems that the increased mobility of people and the focus on tradable skills have made the economics of investment in people poor in many cases. I’ll use a very brief economics term here, not critical, there appears to be a Nash Equilibrium in people investment. Since you cannot hold to your investment, it is better not to invest, at the end everybody ends up acting in the same way.

Singapore

’s approach to this problem is to make training mandatory.

Singapore

taxes 1% on all payrolls and makes training mandatory. I think even on countries where this type of approach could not be met, it is still clear that mutual and coordinated investment in training by a majority of the market participants.

Crazy ideas:

Put a tax of 1% on payrolls for all employees in the world and invest most of the money in training and a small portion should go to the institution that trained and educated that person, in whatever country tha may be (this could solve some of the Brain –Drain problems of the Philippines and South Africa with their medical personnel etc. )

In the same way that Supply Chain theory has been coping with ever more fluctuating demand by trying to customize products the closest to the consumer, we should take a similar approach on innovation for Education and Training. We need a new set of basic skills that allows for later stage customization according to market needs.

First Challenges identified

The big debate has finally begun around the theme of regional identities and struggles and the first conversations identifying the key challenges have begun to take place in small intimate groups, discussion panels and in the big townhall debate.

The first day of the 2006 Annual Meeting was dedicated to identify the key challenges for each of the major themes of this year's event.

With regards to regional identities and struggles , the main challenges identified, with potential global impact, that face the five major world regions over the coming 12-18 months were:

  1. Institution and Governance:  Pushing through the reform agenda, democratization, transparency and building a sense of regional identity and community.  The new “conservative” wave of political leadership. 
  2. Security: Taming social unrest through integration, militarization of rouge states and the development of a new breed of terrorism
  3. Economics: The long oil boom and the repercussion on global economy. The winners and the loosers, Market reforms
  4. Development Struggle: new models of the welfare state for the 21st century, reform of the labour market and changing balance of demographic population of nations ( local vs immigrants),

Key regional questions that need to be addresssed in the next 12-18 months the most pressing ones identified were:

In terms of k

  1. Europe:  How can the European Union clearly define the region’s priorities to ensure that the European Union can work.  Solving the key governance and leadership issue are key to ensuring the ecomomic development of the region in face of a european identity crises

  2. Middle East: How can governments in the middle east ensure that their elections are not simply “window dressing” exercises benefiting simply national elites?  How can the long oil boom ensure regional development and stabilty. 

  3. Latin America: How can, or will, the new regional political alliances arising from the coming to power of conservative goverments make sure that the market the reforms accomplished thus far are continued?

  4. Africa: How can african governments keep the reform agenda moving forward to ensure good public and corporate governance practices become wide spread and they create the structures necessary for strong intra-regional trade aimed at  economic development.

The real question however is what are the mechanisms for change that each region needs to adopt  in order to provide concrete solutions to the key challenges identified?  Are interntational bodies or umbrella organisations going to be able to provide the answers or are the transformations needed only able to be done at a local level?   

Global economic imbalances...

Hi everyone,

I look forward to our interaction and discussions.

As part of the Global Leadership Program in the Forum I am working on Latin America now. My background spans from some years in the Central Bank of Mexico, some  Structured Finance in Emerging Markets to some enterpreneurial experiences...

Best regards,

Emilio Lozoya

Welcome to Economic Imbalances Action Group

Welcome to the World Economic Forum Action Group Blog.

The action group on Economic Imbalances, formed in our Annual Meeting 2006, focuses on the imbalances (and possible shocks) that are affecting global economic conditions -- from fiscal imbalances to the US current account deficit, from "bubbles" to energy prices.

The objective of these blogs is to enable Action Group members to exchange ideas and comments on this topic during the Annual Meeting. But it is open also to other readers, whose comments will be very appreciated! So blog away...

To Action Group 2 members: when posting a blog, please always sign your name so other bloggers know which member of the AG is the author. Also, please always chose the category "Action Group 2" when posting, so the blog is filed and easier to find later on (we don't want good ideas to be lost).

After the Annual Meeting, the blog will become a key mode of communication between AG members throughout the year.

Thanks, and we look forward to your posts!

Ilaria Frau
Global Leadership Fellow
Business Insight
&
Emilio Lozoya
Global Leadership Fellow
Latin America

Welcome to Action Group 5

Welcome to the World Economic Forum Action Group Blog.  This action group, formed in our Annual Meeting 2006 focuses on job creation.

Some of the critical questions we are trying to address in this blog are:

Where and how will the jobs of the future be?
Will the majority of people benefit from the rise in wealth or will there increasingly be winners and losers? Will the winners and losers be within one country or will there be countries and even regions that will end up losers in terms of jobs and employment?
How to deal with the growing gap between workers' skills and skills demanded by companies?How to increase workers mobility and bring people to where the jobs are?
How can the public and private sector cooperate to create jobs?
And so on, questions related to Talent War, outsourcing and its impact on jobs and society, the new challenges to education...

Please enter any relevant messages regarding this theme so we gather and sift through information as we go through our Annual Meeting and also beyond. Please ensure you sign your name after each comment so we can attribute good ideas later. Looking forward to a lively discussion Max

Nordic countries and East Asian tigers top 2005 competitiveness rankings

Finland remains the most competitive economy in the world and tops the rankings for the third consecutive year in The Global Competitiveness Report 2005-2006, released today by the World Economic Forum. The US is in second position, followed by Sweden, Denmark, Taiwan and Singapore, respectively.

"The Nordic countries share a number of characteristics that make them extremely competitive, such as very healthy macroeconomic environments and public institutions that are highly transparent and efficient, with general agreement within society on the spending priorities to be met in the government budget. While the business communities in the Nordic countries point to high tax rates as a potential problem area, there is no evidence that these are adversely affecting the ability of these countries to compete effectively in world markets, or to provide to their respective populations some of the highest standards of living in the world. Indeed, the high levels of government tax revenue have delivered world-class educational establishments, an extensive safety net, and a highly motivated and skilled labour force," said Augusto Lopez-Claros, Chief Economist and Director of the Forum's Global Competitiveness Programme.

For more information, visit the World Economic Forum's website:

Global Competitiveness Report

Press release

Video interviews with the report's authors

Full rankings

Singapore overtakes US to lead Global IT Report

Singapore is the world's top economy in exploiting global IT developments, according to the world Economic Forum’s Global Information Technology Report 2004-2005. The US ceded its top spot and dropped to fifth place, while the Nordic countries continued their impressive track record. Asia performed extremely well this year, as did Estonia, South Africa and Israel in their respective regions.

In the interview below, the Forum’s Chief Economist and Director of the Global Competitiveness Programme, Augusto Lopez-Claros, explains the results of this year’s Report.

Singapore is the star performer in this year’s GITR. What were the decisive factors that pushed it up to first from last year’s eighth place?

Singapore overtakes the United States, topping the rankings of the Networked Readiness Index for the first time. The main factors that explain such an exceptional performance are to be found in Singapore’s excellent ICT infrastructure and regulatory environment. A third factor is the readiness and willingness on the part of the three main stakeholders (i.e. governments, business communities and households) to adopt new technologies and to fully benefit from ICT.

In particular, Singapore is the best performer worldwide in terms of the quality of mathematics and science education, affordability of telephone connection charges, and government prioritization and procurement of ICT. Singapore also scores extremely highly in other areas, such as the affordability of internet access.

As for ICT usage, the country leads the world in terms of the prevalence of foreign technology licensing, government success in ICT promotion, and the availability of government online services.

Why did the US drop to fifth place from the top spot which it held for three years?

This is more a result of other countries’ improvement of their relative position, rather than the result of an actual erosion of the US’s ICT performance. But the US did record a relatively poorer performance this year in all three components of the Networked Readiness Index. On the positive side, it consolidated its global leadership in the business readiness component as well as in variables such as the quality of scientific research institutions and business schools, availability of training opportunities for the labour force, buyer sophistication and venture capital availability.

What do you attribute the Nordic countries’ continued excellent performance this year to?

The Nordic countries again top the rankings this year, with Iceland, Finland, Denmark and Sweden in the second, third, fourth and sixth place respectively. Iceland, in particular, recorded an impressive ICT performance, climbing from 10th position in 2003 to second out of 104 economies in 2004, which represents the greatest improvement among the top performers.

Such a development does not come as a surprise as Nordic countries have consistently shown very high ICT penetration and usage rates and come out among the top performers over the last four years.

Besides having an excellent macroeconomic, regulatory and infrastructure environment, those countries share a commitment by their governments, business communities and households to ICT use. In addition, they are constantly innovating.

As a result, Sweden, Finland and Denmark outrank some of the larger European economies in the number of US patents registered per million population, a frequently used indicator of a nation’s innovation record.

Asian and Pacific economies on the whole also scored well. How can this region’s growing success be explained?

Indeed, Singapore is not the only success story in Asia. A look at this year’s rankings shows that other Asian countries are doing very well on ICT developments:

Hong Kong (7) and Japan (8) have entered the top ten for the first time and Australia, Taiwan, New Zealand, Korea and Malaysia are quite well positioned, at 11, 15, 21, 24 and 27 respectively. India and China have significantly improved their positions to 39th and 41th respectively (from 45th and 51st in 2003).

Taking into account Asia’s growing importance as a major ICT player, this year’s Report includes a country study on Taiwan. Taiwan has achieved an impressive ICT performance over the last 20 years, diversifying its productive structure away from agriculture to technology-intensive industries and emerging as one of the world’s leading manufacturers of ICT products and a source of inspiration to other countries even outside Asia.

What does the Booz Allen Hamilton chapter investigating the future of outsourcing include?

Outsourcing is a defining trend of today’s patterns of production having extended from peripheral business activities to core ones, such as the ICT sector.

Booz Allen Hamilton uses its experience with a wide industry range to identify the best outsourcing practices. Their contribution to this year’s Report, in a chapter entitled "Next Generation IT Outsourcing: Profits or Perils" is therefore a very useful tool for business leaders across the world faced with outsourcing decisions.

The GITR also looks at the issue of Internet in the provision of government services and its importance for European competitiveness. What is the role of ICT in achieving the Lisbon Strategy goals?

As a part of its efforts to make Europe the world’s most competitive knowledge-based economy by 2010, the Lisbon Agenda put a special emphasis on fostering ICT penetration and use at the government, business and household level.

Although the mid-term assessment has revealed that the Lisbon goals are unlikely to be implemented in time, significant progress has been made at strengthening the role of ICT in European societies, as Cisco’s contribution to this year Report points out. "Net Impact: European e-Government" is a chapter that builds on the findings of a Cisco-sponsored research project - the Net Impact series - aimed at understanding the investments and best practices in ICT that foster productivity improvements in public organizations.

Cisco’s contribution provides a very useful analysis on how ICT should be used to improve public sector efficiency and the delivery of services to the general public.

The GITR has assessed the networked readiness of economies for 4 years now. What is the primary aim of the Report and how can it be useful to economies?

The important lesson of the GITR lies in the fact that it demonstrates the important role of ICT in boosting the efficiency of an integrated global economy, as well as boosting growth prospects in developed and developing nations.

Achieving such benefits depends on the cooperation of government, business and individuals. For example, it is not just the government’s responsibility to create the market environment and draw up regulations.

The first pillar of the GITR captures aspects of an economy’s environment for ICT development, such as the regulatory regime, legal framework and available infrastructure.

The second pillar looks at actual levels of networked readiness of the three main stakeholders in the economy: individuals, businesses, and governments. The third pillar examines the actual levels of ICT usage by these three groups.

Arab Business Council

Yesterday we published the discussion summary of the annual Arab Business Council meeting. The Arab world must improve its competitiveness and business will be the driver of economic, corporate and education reforms.

Era of information

Today saw the opening of a spectacular bridge in France.I first read the news on a website in India.Then saw the footage of the bridge on CNN and then heard Mr.Jacques Chirac's sound byte on BBC 24 hr news channel.It is amazing how the world is held together by the wires of information.Similarly a piece of information about a company or a country can not be contained,it can make or break perceptions and have far reaching impacts.Lot of hard work is required if the perceptions have to be consistent and favorable.

Italian perception

The Global Competitiveness Report takes into account the perceptions of Italian executives and Lorenzo posts a very interesting comment on the limitations of quantifying perceptions. He also makes a link between Italy's steady fall in the competitiveness rankings since 2001 and Berlusconi coming to power four years ago.

Coincidence? What do you think?

Italy falls six places in a "disastrous" performance

During the webcast of the Global Competitiveness Report launch yesterday, Michael Porter and Xavier Sala-I-Martin both remarked on Italy's "disastrous" performance. Italy fell six places behind last year's ranking to number 47, two places behind Botswana. Compare this to 2001, when Italy placed number 26.

What is happening in Italy? The ranking this year was partly based on the Executive Opinion Survey. This survey incorporates feedback from business executives inside Italy into the quantifiable competitiveness data. I would like to know to what the Italian media and business community attribute the country's competitiveness ranking.

GCR Webcast

Webcast_launch_1
Here we are watching the launch of the Global Competitiveness Report 2004-2005!
We're sitting in the video conference room at the Geneva head office of the World Economic Forum - and on the screen is chief economist Augusto Lopez-Claros talking to journalists at the launch conference in New York.

Finland most competitive economy

Finland is the most competitive economy in the world, according to the World Economic Forum.

The Fins beat the US to hold on to their top place in this year's Global Competitiveness Report 2004-2005. The top two were followed by Sweden, Taiwan, Denmark and Norway consecutively.

"The Nordic countries are characterized by excellent macroeconomic management overall – they are all running budget surpluses – they have extremely low levels of corruption, with their firms operating in a legal environment in which there is widespread respect for contracts and the rule of law, and their private sectors are on the forefront of technological innovation," said our chief economist, Augusto Lopez-Claros.

See the competitiveness rankings in full.

Some interesting facts:
1. The UK moved up four places to 11th spot
2. Estonia put in a stellar performance, ranking 20th
3. Italy has dropped from 26th place in 2001 to 47
4. At number 22, Chile is the most competitive economy in Latin America
5. China had a mixed performance and was ranked 46th

For more info, check out these links:
Webcast: watch the launch I video interviews I video transcript I press kit I fact sheet I GCR photo gallery

Countdown to the GCR launch!

It's my first Global Competitiveness Report (GCR) launch working full-time with the Global Competitiveness Programme at the Forum and EXCITING is an understatement! We've been coordinating on press releases all over the world, and already beginning to answer questions from governments and media.

When the Report is launched in New York in less than one hour, we will be flooded with questions from around the world. It's so rewarding to realize that the work we've been doing throughout the year generates all this interest.

Oh, and this is also my first blog!

Global Competitiveness Report launch!

The moment many people have been waiting for is nigh. The Global Competitiveness Report 2004-2005 (GCR) will be released soon in New York. Some of our Media team has flown over with Augusto Lopez-Claros to prepare for the launch and the press conference. Meanwhile in Geneva, Forum staff will watch our colleagues at the GCR launch via a live webcast from New York. If everything goes smoothly, the Global Competitiveness Programme team and the web team will breathe a silent sigh of relief when this GCR is finally put to bed.

If you can't watch the report launch you can view these resources: video interviews I video transcript I press kit I fact sheet I GCR photo gallery

After the GCR launch, we'll turn our attention eastwards to India.

Somebody's out there

TJ has found our Global Competitiveness Report and our European Competitiveness Report. His archive is long so you will have to use the search tool to find his posts.

This year's Global Competitiveness Report is around the corner. The media team here is very busy preparing for the launch in New York on 13 October. You can't actually get the report yet but you can order online directly from the publisher.

After all the buzz about China during the China Business Summit, we are now turning our attention to the India Economic Summit. TJ posts a lot of comments on India. He links to this pdf that says that India will be the largest economy by 2050.

Global Competitiveness Report

This year's Global Competitiveness Report will be released on 13 October and this draws a lot of attention every year. We will show a series of webcasts with our Chief Economist, Augusto. Submit your questions to website@weforum.org before 30 September and he will answer them online.

all categories

most recent posts

all blogs

archive

search

  • Powered by Google